Skip to content
ForHomely
Free calculator · no sign-up

House Hacking vs. Renting vs. Single-Family Comparison

Should you house hack a duplex, buy a single-family home, or keep renting and invest the difference? This tool projects five years of net worth across all three paths using identical assumptions.

Scenario Inputs

House Hack Monthly Cost

$1,654

PITIA $3,054 − rent

Buy SFH Monthly Cost

$2,691

full PITIA

Keep Renting

$1,600

grows with rent growth

5-Year Net Worth Projection

Visual wealth accumulation comparison after 5 years of holding

🏠 House Hack (Duplex)-$439,095
🏡 Buy Single-Family-$384,208
🏢 Rent & Invest Difference$86,134
YearHouse Hack (Duplex)Buy Single-FamilyKeep Renting & Investing
Year 1-$382,763-$334,917$26,459
Year 2-$394,750-$345,406$40,953
Year 3-$408,062-$357,054$55,730
Year 4-$422,805-$369,955$70,791
Year 5-$439,095-$384,208$86,134

Projections assume: equity = appreciated value minus remaining loan balance; the renter invests the same down payment plus the monthly difference between owning and renting at your assumed return. Excludes transaction costs, maintenance, and taxes — real-world results vary.

How to Read This

  • House hacking usually wins when the rent from the other unit covers a large share of the duplex PITIA — your housing cost drops while you build leveraged equity.
  • Buying a single-family builds equity too, but with 100% of the payment on your shoulders.
  • Renting and investing wins in years 1-3 when markets are flat or your rent is far below the cost of owning — leverage and appreciation flip the table in years 4-5+.

Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is transmitted or stored.

Formulas reviewed by Toheeb Ekundayo · September 12, 2026

How this calculator works

The engine models three parallel futures using identical inputs, so the comparison is apples-to-apples. Each path’s net worth is tracked annually for five years.

Path 1: House hacking a duplex

You buy the duplex with the entered down payment and live in one unit. Your monthly cost is the full PITIA minus the rent from the other unit. Net worth grows through two channels: appreciation (value × (1 + appreciation rate)ⁿ) and amortization (the loan balance shrinking as tenants and you pay it down). Because the tenant subsidizes the payment, house hacking typically builds equity faster per dollar of personal cash outflow than any other path.

Path 2: Buying a single-family home

Same mechanics, but 100% of the payment comes from your pocket. The equity build is real but the monthly burn is higher, which is exactly what the side-by-side table exposes.

Path 3: Keep renting and invest the difference

The renter invests the same down payment at your assumed return, plus each month’s difference between the cost of owning the single-family and the current rent (which grows at your rent-growth assumption). This is the financially rigorous version of “renting is throwing money away.” Sometimes it is, and sometimes the invested difference compounds faster than home equity.

The remaining-balance formula

Balance(m) = Loan × [ (1+r)ⁿ − (1+r)ᵐ ] ÷ [ (1+r)ⁿ − 1 ]

where m is the number of months elapsed. This is the standard closed-form remaining balance on an amortizing loan.

Worked example

A $400,000 duplex (3.5% down, 6.75%, $1,400 rent from unit 2) versus a $350,000 single-family versus renting at $1,600: the house hack costs roughly $1,700 a month out of pocket, the single-family about $2,600, and renting $1,600. After five years at 3% appreciation, the house hack’s equity is roughly $95,000, the single-family’s about $83,000, and the renter’s invested portfolio lands between $60,000 and $90,000 depending on the assumed return. The house hack wins on net worth and has the lowest monthly cost, which is why it is the default first move for most aspiring investors.

What the model deliberately excludes

  • Transaction costs: buying and selling run 6-10% round trip, which penalizes short holding periods.
  • Maintenance and CapEx: owners pay 1-2% of value annually; renters do not.
  • Taxes:the renter’s investment returns are pre-tax; mortgage interest deductions and depreciation are ignored.
  • Vacancy: the house hack assumes continuous rent collection.

Treat the output as a directional comparison, not a guarantee. Adjust appreciation and rent growth to stress-test pessimistic scenarios before committing. When you are ready to finance, the FHA vs. Conventional 97 comparison explains which low-down-payment program fits.

Frequently asked questions

Is house hacking a duplex better than renting?
Often, but not always. House hacking builds equity through appreciation and loan paydown while a tenant subsidizes the payment, and it unlocks landlord tax deductions. Renting wins when the cost of owning far exceeds rent and the difference, invested, compounds faster than leveraged appreciation. The calculator shows which case you are in.
What down payment should house hackers use?
FHA's 3.5% is the classic entry point for owner-occupied 2-4 unit purchases. Conventional owner-occupied financing allows 5% on 1-2 units (and, since late 2023, 5% on 3-4 units under Fannie Mae's updated policy). Model both with the homebuyer mortgage calculator.
Why does renting sometimes win?
In high-price, low-rent markets, the monthly cost of owning far exceeds renting. If that gap invested at 6-8% compounds faster than leveraged appreciation, the renter path wins, especially in the first three years before amortization and appreciation compound.
Does the model account for rent I pay myself?
In the house hack path, the rent from the other unit reduces your out-of-pocket cost, which is the economic equivalent of paying yourself. The equity build happens regardless of who funds the payment.
What does the projection leave out?
Transaction costs (6-10% round trip), maintenance and CapEx, income taxes on investment returns, mortgage-interest and depreciation deductions, and vacancy. Treat the output as a directional comparison and stress-test pessimistic appreciation and rent growth before committing.

Related landlord and operations guides